Is the nomination of a former INEC chairman for an ambassadorial role a threat to Nigeria's electoral integrity? This question has sparked debate, but the Northern Stakeholders Consultative Initiative (NSCI) believes the concerns are misplaced. They argue that the independence of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) is secure, regardless of the post-service career of its former leaders.
In a statement, the NSCI, through its Convener, Comrade Yerima Shettima, addressed the controversy surrounding the nomination of outgoing INEC Chairman, Prof. Mahmood Yakubu, for an ambassadorial position. The group dismissed the concerns as “misguided” and “reckless,” citing a lack of understanding of democratic governance.
Shettima emphasized that INEC's autonomy is legally protected. He stated, “The independence and impartiality of INEC are enshrined in law. The notion that Prof. Yakubu’s next assignment could weaken this independence is unfounded.”
But here's where it gets controversial... The NSCI highlights that INEC is one of Nigeria's most scrutinized public institutions, with constant monitoring from political parties, civil society groups, and the media. This multi-layered oversight, they argue, ensures that no single individual can unduly influence the electoral process.
The group also pointed to the reforms implemented since 2010, noting that the commission has consistently strengthened its systems, regardless of leadership changes. They credited Yakubu with promoting electoral transparency through technological innovations, which they believe contributed to significant gains for opposition parties in the 2023 general elections.
Shettima further praised Yakubu's public service record, highlighting his service under four presidents with diverse political backgrounds: Umaru Musa Yar'Adua, Goodluck Jonathan, Muhammadu Buhari, and President Bola Ahmed Tinubu. He also mentioned Yakubu's previous role as Executive Secretary of the Tertiary Education Trust Fund (TETFUND) between 2007 and 2012, demonstrating his capacity to serve without partisan interests.
The NSCI believes Yakubu's ambassadorial nomination should be viewed as a recognition of his service, not a threat to INEC. They urged political actors and civil society organizations to focus on strengthening democratic institutions, warning that unfounded narratives could erode public trust in the electoral system.
“Democracy thrives on strong institutions, not strong men,” Shettima said, calling for collective efforts to safeguard INEC’s integrity. The group reaffirmed its support for Yakubu’s nomination and called for a more constructive national conversation on electoral reforms and accountability.
What do you think? Do you agree with the NSCI's assessment, or do you believe the nomination raises legitimate concerns about INEC's independence? Share your thoughts in the comments below!
